To add to this, uncertainty means that more workers will be hired only as temporary or part-time. Easier for the employer to shift emphasis and priorities if the need arises. Some have the idea that employers hire people because those people need jobs. Employers hire people because they have work that needs to be done- with the expectation that the end will be profitable for both.
Did you ever call a plumber simply because you sensed that he needed the work?
Precisely, Ken. And the expectation of profit is key to understanding the motivation of employers in hiring workers. No expectation of profit, no hiring.
But...but...but...but...but the EXPERTS over at Cone's have insisted it's lack of demand for products and services that's causing the employment slowdown.
And...and...and...and...and...and the solution is clearly MORE government spending on infrastructure!
But...but...but...but....but just ignore the facts that infrastructure spending by itself doesn't create "demand", and make-work government programs only provide temporary employment, unless the ultimate aim is to perpetuate yet another government boondogle program that interferes with public sector growth.
Essentially, for the government to provide steady employment, the same bridge would have to be built and rebuilt continuously.
Those who made denim pants depended on the customer wearing them out and buying more.
Walter Williams on the subject.
http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=583230&p=1
Posted by: Ken Hill | August 30, 2011 at 08:56 PM
To add to this, uncertainty means that more workers will be hired only as temporary or part-time. Easier for the employer to shift emphasis and priorities if the need arises. Some have the idea that employers hire people because those people need jobs. Employers hire people because they have work that needs to be done- with the expectation that the end will be profitable for both.
Did you ever call a plumber simply because you sensed that he needed the work?
Posted by: Ken Hill | August 30, 2011 at 09:31 PM
Precisely, Ken. And the expectation of profit is key to understanding the motivation of employers in hiring workers. No expectation of profit, no hiring.
Posted by: Joe Guarino | August 30, 2011 at 11:15 PM
But...but...but...but...but the EXPERTS over at Cone's have insisted it's lack of demand for products and services that's causing the employment slowdown.
And...and...and...and...and...and the solution is clearly MORE government spending on infrastructure!
But...but...but...but....but just ignore the facts that infrastructure spending by itself doesn't create "demand", and make-work government programs only provide temporary employment, unless the ultimate aim is to perpetuate yet another government boondogle program that interferes with public sector growth.
Posted by: bubba | August 31, 2011 at 09:07 AM
I know, Bubba. Let's hope we have the opportunity to turn this around in about 18 months.
Posted by: Joe Guarino | August 31, 2011 at 09:22 AM
Essentially, for the government to provide steady employment, the same bridge would have to be built and rebuilt continuously.
Those who made denim pants depended on the customer wearing them out and buying more.
Posted by: Ken Hill | August 31, 2011 at 11:06 AM